USPTO serial 78335699
MM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Monchengladbach, DE
Monchengladbach, DE
Monchengladbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for use at industrial milling plants for use in manufacturing pipes, wire, strips, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, namely, metalworking machines for cutting and forming, and otherwise processing and working seamless and welded pipes, including large capacity pipes, cold and hot pipe rolling mills, rolling mills for wire, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, pipe and wire drawing machines, wire ring presses, pipe and metal rod coilers, hot-iron saws, cold saws, electrical and hydraulic shears and pipe cutting machines, cooling beds in the nature of transport machines for adjusting elongated pipes, wire, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, metal straightening machines, pipe-testing presses, coil laying heads for coiling of wire, bundling machines, weighing machines, calibrating machines, electric pipe-welding machines, strip coiling machines, strip storage in the nature of machine operated platforms capable of elevation above ground level, strip metal straightening machines, metal working machines in the nature of section rolling mills, large-pipe sheet-metal shaping machines, sheet-metal edge millers, pipe expansion machines, free-forming forging presses,radial forging machines, manipulators for forging presses and for forging machines, sheet-metal and metal section straightening machines, cable-sheathing presses, mechanical and hydraulic metal powder presses, continuous metal casting machines, continuous metal casting and rolling mills, metal rolling and drawing machines, and milling machines for rods and bars, all of the above goods for the metal, copper, nonferrous metals and aluminum industries; hydraulic, emulsifying and lubricating installations for lubricating and cooling of rolling stock, shot-blasting machines, cooling beds for pipes, wire, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, and heat-treatment machines all for use in the metalworking industry; electric, laser and gas-powered metal butt and pipe welding machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 1954 |
| 009 | Electronic measuring and testing apparatus and instruments for rolling and forging plants for use in the manufacture of pipes, wire, strips, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, electronic weighing apparatus for rolling and forging plants for use in the manufacture of pipes, wire, strips, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, and automated systems comprising software for the production of pipes, wire, strips, steel rods, billets, rails and sections thereof, all of the above for use in the metalworking industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 1954 |
| 011 | Melting furnaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 1954 |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Design of computer programs for others for data processing purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEER GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |