USPTO serial 78335794
GOLDEN KID GOLDEN KID BRAND HSINHUA RICE VERMICELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLDEN KID GOLDEN KID BRAND HSINHUA RICE VERMICELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia C. Weber
CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Spices; spice preparations; cinnamon; spices in the form of powders; spice powders for culinary use; saffron for use as a seasoning; curry powders; condiments, namely, mustard, ketchup, mayonnaise, Asam paste and Tom Yam paste; cloves; vermicelli noodles; vermicelli, including rice vermicelli; noodles; rice; rice cakes; ground pepper in the nature of a spice; sesame seeds for use as a seasoning; sugars other than for medical purposes; processed grains, namely, barley prepared for human consumption and prepared pearl barley; sago; star aniseed for use as a seasoning; prawn crackers; crackers; dried whole wheat grains; honey; processed corn; candy; soy sauce | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |