USPTO serial 78335859
VITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2006
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LANGENFELD, DE
Langenfeld, DE
Langenfeld, DE
Langenfeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21st FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR ROLLING, UNROLLING AND WET TREATMENT, NAMELY FOR IMPREGNATING, ENAMELING, COATING AND DYEING, LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CUTTING, THESE MACHINES INDEPENDENTLY OR TOGETHER WITH THE APPARATUS FOR UPGRADING PLANTS, NAMELY, WEB ROLLERS, WEB UNROLLERS, WEB IMPREGNATORS, WEB COATERS, WEB DYERS, WEB CUTTERS, WEB PRINTERS, WEB TREATERS AND ROLL PRESSES FOR WEBS OF CELLULOSE, TEXTILE, GLASS, PLASTIC AND METAL | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2003 |
| 011 | APPARATUS, NAMELY, DRIERS, KILNS, COOLERS, HEAT GENERATORS, CONTROLLER AND WASTE AIR PURIFICATORS FOR THE THERMAL TREATMENT BY AIR OR GASES, NAMELY DRYING, JELLYING, CONDENSING, STOVING, ANNEALING AND COOLING OF MATERIALS MADE OF CELLULOSE, TEXTILE, GLASS, PLASTIC AND METAL IN RUNNING WEBS OF PAPER, PAPER BOARD, FLEECE, WOVENS, BANDS OR FOILS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 037 | REPARATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MACHINES FOR ROLLING, UNROLLING AND WET TREATMENT, NAMELY FOR IMPREGNATING, ENAMELING, COATING AND DYEING, LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CUTTING, THESE MACHINES INDEPENDENTLY OR TOGETHER WITH THE APPARATUS OF UPGRADING PLANTS FOR WEBS OF CELLULOSE, TEXTILE, GLASS, PLASTIC AND METAL AND DRIERS, KILNS, COOLERS, HEAT GENERATORS, CONTROLLER AND WASTE AIR PURIFICATORS | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2006 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTING FOR ROLLING, UNROLLING AND WET TREATMENT, NAMELY FOR IMPREGNATING, ENAMELING, COATING AND DYEING, LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CUTTING, THESE MACHINES INDEPENDENTLY OR TOGETHER WITH THE APPARATUS OF UPGRADING PLANTS FOR WEBS OF CELLULOSE, TEXTILE, GLASS, PLASTIC AND METAL AND DRIERS, KILNS, COOLERS, HEAT GENERATORS, CONTROLLER AND WASTE AIR PURIFICATORS | ACTIVE | Aug 26, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITS TECHNOLOGY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by VITS SYSTEMS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by VITS SYSTEMS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by VITS SYSTEMS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VITS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |