USPTO serial 78336123
POWER OF PINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER OF PINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Hyde
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry additives, namely, bluing, pre-soak, and fabric softeners; laundry detergent and laundry bleach; soil and stain removing preparations. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |