Drawing for AADAM

USPTO serial 78336148

AADAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AADAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry K. Mueller, Jr.

JERRY K MUELLER JR LDINGMUELLER & SMITH LPA7700 RIVERS EDGE DR MUELLER-SMITH BUICOLUMBUS, OH 43235-1355

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Multi-component system for marking goods for authentication and diversion detection for use in the field of consumer, commercial, and industrial goods, comprising one or more of the following optical taggants in the nature of chemical inks used in various forms to tag goods for identification-- DNA/RNA taggant which are determined by chemical and/or physichemical analysis, infrared phosphors, ultraviolet radiation taggants, Ramen spectral detectable taggants, quantum dots, pit and land codes which are detected by audible signal, analog optical codes, two-dimensional algorithmic marks, radiofrequency identification marks, and atomic force microscope detectable codesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 17, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 17, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance