USPTO serial 78336372
OXYSURE PURE OXYGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3528998Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2008
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OXYSURE PURE OXYGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRISCO, TX
FRISCO, TX
McKinney, TX
FRISCO, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew C. Lipton
MATTHEW C. LIPTON OXYSURE SYSTEMS, INC.10880 JOHN W ELLIOTT DR STE 600FRISCO, TX 75034-3274UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, oxygen generating apparatus, parts and fittings for such apparatus, namely, oxygen masks for medical use and refill packs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYSURE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYSURE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ross Global, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OXYSURE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named OXYSURE PURE OXYGEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 15, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |