Drawing for ENPATH DELIVERY SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 78336951

ENPATH DELIVERY SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENPATH DELIVERY SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROLYN M. SANDBERG

GARRETT M. WEBER LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.4200 IDS CENTER 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Percutaneous and venous vessel introducers for use in implanting pacing leads, central venous catheters, infusion catheters and ports and associated parts thereof; biomedical devices for use in arterial, vascular, transthoracic and pericardial surgery or medical procedures; hemo-dialysis catheters, including center-line retractable safety needles and associated parts thereofACTIVE—
035Business marketing consulting services for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for othersACTIVE—
040Contract manufacturing of for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for othersACTIVE—
042Research and development, design, testing and consulting services to obtain regulatory approval for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance