Drawing for VERSAILLES

USPTO serial 78337027

VERSAILLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERSAILLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIA A. SCUNGIO

Maria A. Scungio Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPF.D.R. Station P.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033VODKAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance