Drawing for ARAXIS

USPTO serial 78337042

ARAXIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3462241Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2008
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ARAXIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard A. MacCord, Jr.

Howard A. MacCord, Jr. MacCord Mason PLLCPO Box 2974Greensboro, NC 27402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for planning and scheduling in the field of project management; computer software for project management, namely for managing time, resources, personnel, workflow, productivity, business targets, and for task-tracking; computer software for project management, namely, to allocate, resources, and targets, and to track the progress, of a team of people carrying out a project; file management software; computer software for quality control,electronic file management, and electronic file access control in the fields of software development and web site development; change-management software, namely for identifying, tracking, and managing changes in source code during software development; source-code control software for auditing and reviewing source code for use in the fields of software development and web site development; merge software for comparing and merging electronic text and data files; version control software for controlling and managing revisions of electronic text and data files; data management software and database software for use in the fields of software development, web site development, and project management; instruction and user manuals for software packages and programs on computer media; downloadable electronic publications in the form of instruction and user manuals for software packages and programsACTIVEDec 6, 1995
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND THE PROVISION OF ADVICE CONCERNING COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMSACTIVEApr 22, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 21, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 21, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 6, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2014NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 20148.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 2013PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED—
Oct 22, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2013PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Sep 5, 2013PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Sep 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2008FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2008ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 27, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 11, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 11, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance