USPTO serial 78337088
PERDIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERDIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Powley
Robert L. Powley Powley & Gibson, P.C.304 Hudson Street, 2nd FloorNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Sausage binding materials, namely, cellulose and plastic food casings | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Preserved meat, salted meat, meat, pork, chicken meat, game, partridge, hamburgers, sausages, pastrami, ham, salami, processed meat, namely ham, turkey, chicken, lamb and beef; industrialized processed meat, namely, ham, turkey, chicken, lamb and beef; tarnished chicken, tarnished meat, poultry, seasoned poultry, smoked poultry, prepared ready-made dishes consisting primarily of meat; smoked pork loins, processed ham, pasted liver, bacon, preserved beans, blood sausage, edible bone oil, bouillon concentrates, chicken and meat croquettes; fish fillets, meals consisting primarily of fish, frozen fruits, frosted fruits, jams, frozen vegetables, frosted vegetables, preserved lentils, meat extracts, pickles, fruit pulp, vegetable salads, fruit salads, salted fish, sausages in batter, soups, bouillon, vegetable soup preparations, preserved soya beans, tuna fish, cooked vegetables, dried vegetables, preserved vegetables, tinned vegetables; meatballs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chicken dumplings; fruit jellies; biscuits, breads, gingerbreads, bread rolls, breadcrumbs, buns, cake paste, cake powder, cakes, flavorings for cakes other than essential oils; edible cake decorations; confectionary chips for baking; cereal products in the nature of breakfast cereals; condiments in the nature of mustard; confectionery, namely, frozen confections; cookies, crackers, custard, farinaceous foods in the nature of farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; macaroni, macaroons, pastry, maize flour, milled maize, roasted maize, malt biscuits, corn meal, meat pies, kibe in the nature of ground meat in a pastry dough, noodles, pancakes, pasta, chocolate pastes, pastry, petit fours, cakes, pies, pizzas, pralines, puddings, quiches, ravioli; spaghetti, spring rolls, tarts, vermicelli, waffles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERDIGAO AGROINDUSTRIAL S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PERDIGAO AGROINDUSTRIAL S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PERDIX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |