Drawing for M-LINK

USPTO serial 78337132

M-LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M-LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD LANE

Edward Lane Protections Equinox1500, Du College, suite 410St. Laurent, H4L 5G6CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic control systems for a fixed or mobile electronic feeder intended for individuals, for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional buildings, for automobile vehicles, recreational vehicles, heavy machinery and any other mobile or fixed objects used for localized processing of data pertaining to security, domotic and telematic functions and transmitting this data over wired or wireless circuits to an end user, a system administrator or a remote monitoring center; and for fixed or mobile alarm systems intended for individuals, for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional buildings, for heavy machinery and any other mobile or fixed objects, used to transmit electrical signals over wired or wireless circuits to an end user, a system administrator or a remote monitoring center; electronic control systems for a fixed or mobile electronic feeder intended for individuals, for residential, commercial, industrial and institutional buildings, for heavy machinery and any other mobile or fixed objects, used for localized processing of data pertaining to security, domotic and telematic functions and transmitting this data over wired or wireless circuits to an end user, a system administrator or a remote monitoring center; and fixed or mobile alarm systems intended for individuals, for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional buildings, for heavy machinery and any other mobile or fixed objects, used to execute security, domotic and telematic functions, namely, remote surveillance and remote operations including transmission of alarm signals, transmission of On/Off commands, Start/Stop of an automobile vehicle engine, locking and unlocking of an automobile vehicle's doors and trunk, opening and closing an automobile vehicle's side and rear windows, activating inside light panels, activating an automobile vehicle's horn, activating an automobile vehicle's anti-theft system horn, activating an automobile vehicle's exterior lights and headlights; executing selected automotive diagnostic functions including fire detection, theft detection, rotations per minute of the engine and of the wheels, status On/Off of electrical circuits; electronic control systems for automobile vehicles and heavy machinery used to remotely localize an object by way of geographical triangulation, namely the spatial localization of a mobile object emitting an electromagnetic or electrical signal of known transmission speed obtained upon observation of the relative distance of the object with at least three fixed observation pointsACTIVE—
012Alarms for automobile vehicles and recreational vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2006UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Nov 8, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 26, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 19, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 24, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 23, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance