USPTO serial 78337216
CUSTOMVIS:THE FUTURE IN SIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3594904Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2009
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CUSTOMVIS:THE FUTURE IN SIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Western Australia, AU
Western Australia, AU
Western Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA A FRIEDMAN
Barbara A. Friedman EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC9801 WASHINGTONIAN BLVD., SUITE 750GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lasers for non-medical purposes; laser beam scanning systems for ophthalmic application for lasers for non-medical purposes; laser beam scanning apparatus and equipment for lasers for ophthalmic application for non-medical purposes; tracking systems for ophthalmic application for lasers for non-medical purposes; tracking apparatus and equipment for ophthalmic application for lasers for non-medical purposes; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; software and computer programs for non-medical lasers, non-medical laser beam scanning systems, non-medical laser beam scanning apparatus, tracking systems for non-medical lasers, tracking apparatus for non-medical lasers, ophthalmic purposes involving the use of apparatus for the diagnosis, correction, treatment and detection of vision and eye problems, ophthalmic procedures involving the use of apparatus for the diagnosis, correction, treatment and detection of vision and eye problems, ophthalmic surgery involving the use of apparatus for the detection, diagnosis, correction and treatment of vision and eye problems, eye tracking and ancillary procedures involving the use of apparatus for the detection, diagnosis, correction and treatment of vision and eye problems, ophthalmic apparatus, ophthalmic equipment and diagnostics for measuring the visual pathways of the eye | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical purposes, namely, lasers for ophthalmic surgery and ophthalmic procedures; laser beam scanning systems for ophthalmic application for lasers for medical purposes; laser beam scanning apparatus and equipment for ophthalmic application for lasers for medical purposes; tracking apparatus and equipment for ophthalmic application for lasers for medical purposes; medical apparatus, equipment and instruments, namely, eye scanning apparatus and equipment involving the use of apparatus for the detection, diagnosis, correction and treatment of vision and eye problems; eye tracking apparatus and equipment involving the use of apparatus for the detection, diagnosis, correction and treatment of vision and eye problems; diagnostic apparatus, equipment and tools for ophthalmic application for measuring the visual pathways of the eye; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | WDLL | RESPONSE TO WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | WDLD | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY DENIED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |