Drawing for HAIR ART

USPTO serial 78337311

HAIR ART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIR ART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW D. SKALE

ANDREW D. SKALE MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO5355 SORRENTO MESA PLACESUITE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely, hair sprays, hair sheens and hair spray gelsACTIVE—
008ScissorsACTIVE—
009Hair styling tools, namely, electric flat irons and electric curling irons.ACTIVE—
011electric hair dryers, namely, hand held electric hair dryers and stationary hair dryers for domestic useACTIVE—
021Hair brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 4, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance