USPTO serial 78337474
M-INVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3412599Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2008
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M-INVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth A. Langworthy, David E. Weslow, Patricia B. Cunningham, John L. North, Peter G. Pappas, Daniel J. Warren, James H. Johnson, Jr.
Elisabeth A. Langworthy, Esq. Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP700 Sixth Street, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20001-3980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of wireless, mobile and Internet communications, Short Messaging Services (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS), web and voice communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2006 |
| 042 | Communications services, namely, technical consultation in the field of wireless and Internet communications, mobile Internet, Short Messaging Services (SMS), Multimedia Messaging Services (MMS), web and voice communications solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Georgia Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Georgia Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Georgia Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M-INVENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |