Drawing for CORPORATE FOCUS

USPTO serial 78337529

CORPORATE FOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CORPORATE FOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry E. Negrin

BARRY E. NEGRIN LEVISOHN, BERGER & LANGSAM, LLP805 THIRD AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized database managementACTIVEOct 11, 2000
038Electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminalsACTIVEOct 11, 2000
042Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation, and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer programming for others; computer project management services; computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer service, namely acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information; computer service, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; computer software development; database development servicesACTIVEOct 11, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2008UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
May 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 28, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 28, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 6, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 11, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance