Drawing for BRING ON THE MADNESS

USPTO serial 78337981

BRING ON THE MADNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRING ON THE MADNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond M. Berens

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Sports-related apparel, namely, t-shirts, shorts, jackets, footwear, headbands, wristbands and capsACTIVE—
028Game balls, namely, baseballs, basketballs, footballs, volleyballs, tennis balls, racquet balls; ball bats, namely, baseball bats, softball bats; and ball gloves, namely, softball gloves, baseball gloves, racquet ball gloves, handball gloves.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 15, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 10, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance