Drawing for HEY, YOU GOT A CHOICE

USPTO serial 78338131

HEY, YOU GOT A CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEY, YOU GOT A CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Gitchel

JEFFREY M GITCHEL BAYER CORPORATE & BUSINESS SERVICES LLC100 BAYER RDPITTSBURGH, PA 15205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, an LH-RH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) agonist preparation for use in the treatment of cancer; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, an LH-RH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) agonist preparation and an implantable drug delivery system comprised of an impermeable reservoir, a piston, a water-swellable agent formulation, an LH-RH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) agonist formulation, a semi-permeable plug, and a back-diffusion regulating outlet for use in the treatment of cancer, sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance