Drawing for THE OFFICIAL TOASTING BOURBON

USPTO serial 78338450

THE OFFICIAL TOASTING BOURBON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE OFFICIAL TOASTING BOURBON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Brown

ELIZABETH KUTYLA-MINER Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages; namely, whiskeyACTIVESep 8, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 28, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 19, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance