USPTO serial 78338770
EXSELLERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3197257Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXSELLERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELE L. DIETZ
MICHELE L. DIETZ REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 NORTH WATER STREETSUITE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online auction management services for online auction sellers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |