Drawing for PROSYNC

USPTO serial 78339068

PROSYNC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSYNC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grace J. Han

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; computer consulting services in the field of interactive broadcasting; technical consultation in the field of interactive broadcasting; maintenance of computer software; computer software and software application design for others and development; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware, server hardware and computer software problems; and design and development of computer hardware and server architecture for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance