USPTO serial 78339165
TIGER BASMATI RICE EXTRA LONG SUPER KERNEL WE BELIEVE IN THE BEST CALL TOLL FREE NO. 1-877-3TIGER4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGER BASMATI RICE EXTRA LONG SUPER KERNEL WE BELIEVE IN THE BEST CALL TOLL FREE NO. 1-877-3TIGER4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 EAST BETHANY HOME ROADSUITE A - 213PHOENIZ, AZ 85012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | RICE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ando International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ando International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TIGER BASMATI RICE EXTRA LONG SUPER KERNEL WE BELIEVE IN THE BEST CALL TOLL FREE NO. 1-877-3TIGER4
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |