USPTO serial 78339445
ONCOANSWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONCOANSWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K Ebling
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44) Computer software for use in information management, market analysis, forecasting and business planning in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and manuals provided together therewith; communications computer software linking users to remote databases, and manuals provided together therewith; (Based on Sections 1(b) and 44) Computer software for use in customer planning and customer relations management, and manuals provided together therewith. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 016 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44) Printed instructional manuals for computer software for information management, communications computer software linking data bases and services in remote computer information management, market analysis, forecasting and business planning in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; Printed instructional manuals for communications computer software for linking users to remote databases; (Based on Sections 1(b) and 44) Printed instructional manuals for computer software for use in customer planning and customer relations management. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 035 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44) Consulting services, namely, business planning consultation in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; providing on-line computer databases through password-protected websites featuring information and reports in the fields of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Strategic Answers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ONCOANSWERS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |