USPTO serial 78339705
AMERICA'S TEAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICA'S TEAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Baird
Stephen R. Baird Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A.225 South Sixth StreetSuite 3500Minneapolis, MI 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |