USPTO serial 78340477
MR. FOOD NO-FUSS MEALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2005
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MR. FOOD NO-FUSS MEALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Ricciardi
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | providing meal assembly facilities, menus, food ingredients, meal preparation instructions and food containers for preparation of meals by others; personalized meal preparation, namely food preparation for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |