Drawing for SYMMETRY: BEAUTY BASED ON THE EXCELLENCE OF PROPORTION

USPTO serial 78340769

SYMMETRY: BEAUTY BASED ON THE EXCELLENCE OF PROPORTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYMMETRY: BEAUTY BASED ON THE EXCELLENCE OF PROPORTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark N. Mutterperl

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Foundations; foundation sticks; camouflage cremes; concealers; cover sticks; makeup tints; makeup highlighters; face powders; bronzing powders; bronzing cremes; blushes, namely, powders, cremes, sticks; cosmetic compacts; eye shadows; eye dusts; eye color creme shadows; eye pencils; eyeliners; mascara; browliners; brow shadows; lipsticks; lip cremes; lip glosses; lip pencils; lip sealers; cosmetic brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 21, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 20, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance