Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78341041?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78341041. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BAIKALSKAYA?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78341041, the listed owner(s) include: Irkutsk Joint-Stock Company "Kedr", JOINT-STOCK COMPANY \"INTELTECK\", JOINT-STOCK COMPANY "BAIK".

What is USPTO serial number 78341041?

Serial number 78341041 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BAIKALSKAYA. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover BAIKALSKAYA?

The public record lists International Classes: 033. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: BAIKALSKAYA Serial# 78341041 | status 603; last event MAB3 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of BAIKALSKAYA?

BAIKALSKAYA (78341041) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAIKALSKAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray, Matthew J. Laskoski

JAMES C WRAY MATTHEW J LASKOSKI LAW OFFICES OF JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
033	vodka	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 12, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 2, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 1, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 27, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 17, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 19, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 19, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 8, 2006	EXAR	EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART	—
Nov 23, 2005	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
Nov 22, 2005	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Sep 29, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 15, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 14, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Sep 14, 2005	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 14, 2005	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 14, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 14, 2005	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 21, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2004	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 17, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 17, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 19, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 6, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

BAIKALSKAYA