USPTO serial 78341104
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
Murray, UT
Other trademarks owned by Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
Murray, UT
Other trademarks owned by Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
Murray, UT
Other trademarks owned by Electromechanical Technologies, Inc.
CALGARY, CA
CALGARY, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Mayback & Hoffman, P.A.5846 S. Flamingo Rd. #232Fort Lauderdale, FL 33330UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scanners for inspection and scanning of pipelines, pipes and metal structures such as storage tanks, utilizing magnetic flux leakage and other nondestructive inspection technologies, and having on board data acquisition systems designed to detect and record anomalies in the metallic material and pipe | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 2004 |
| 042 | Nondestructive inspection and examination services of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline, pipe and metal structures; technical analysis and evaluation of measured inspection data from pipelines, pipe and metal structures; rendering technical opinions on mechanical and structural integrity of the inspected pipeline, pipe and other metal structures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |