Drawing for ECOACH

USPTO serial 78341161

ECOACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ECOACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Mangelson

MICHAEL E MANGELSON STOEL RIVES LLP201 S MAIN ST STE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting an on-line health education program for promoting an individual's overall physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being and providing incentives to employees of employer groups and members of health plans to demonstrate excellence in the field of achieving a high physical, mental, emotional, and/or spiritual well-beingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 20, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 20, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 20, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 20, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 6, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance