USPTO serial 78341168
ITRANSLATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITRANSLATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOWNE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS II, INC.
NEW YORK, NY
LIONBRIDGE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS II, INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by LIONBRIDGE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS II, INC.
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Goods and services price quotations, namely, providing on-line quotations for translation services to be provided by others; providing an interactive website whereby buyers of translation services locate, submit, track, allocate and receive quotations from multiple competitive sources and sellers of translation services identify and bid on multiple translation job opportunities; business strategy consultation and international business marketing consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Localization services; computer software localization services; web page and web site localization services; technical document localization services; database localization services; website design services for others; product research services-- technical document authoring, namely technical writing for others; database development services; computer services, namely computer programming and managing web sites for others; computer software modification and maintenance services; computer software development services; computer consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOWNE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS II, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LIONBRIDGE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS II, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bowne of Los Angeles, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ITRANSLATOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |