USPTO serial 78341355
BUG WRENCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUG WRENCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned W. Randle
NED W RANDLE POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESISTE 200 12412 POWERSCOURT DRSAINT LOUIS, MO 63131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand tools, namely wrenches | ABANDONED | Apr 29, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |