USPTO serial 78341405
SCHINDLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHINDLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Klaus P. Stoffel
KLAUS P STOFFEL WOLFF & SAMSON PCONE BOLAND DRWEST ORANGE, NJ 07052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and business organizational consultation; direct marketing advertising for others; advertising agency services; public relations; organization of exhibitions of goods and services in relation to elevators, escalators, and other vertical, horizontal and inclined conveyor installations, master key systems, access control and security systems of buildings and public facilities; publication and dissemination of publicity texts; demonstration of goods and services for advertising purposes; distribution of samples and direct mail advertising; providing information about the goods and services of others via computer databases on the global computer network; operation of telephone call centers for others, namely, customer service in the field of elevators, escalators, and other vertical, horizontal and inclined conveyor installations, master key systems, access control and security systems of buildings and public facilities, and electronic processing of orders for others; computerized tracking and tracing of packages in transit; employment agencies; procurement, namely, purchasing of goods and services in relation to elevators, escalators and other vertical, horizontal and inclined conveyor installation, master key systems, access control and security systems of buildings and public facilities, for others; e-commerce services, namely, providing product information via electronic transmission for commercial or advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of building security, elevator and escalator security, and the security of other vertical, horizontal and inclined conveyor installations; security guard service consultation; and monitoring of burglar and security alarms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |