CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WETMETRICS

USPTO serial 78341494

WETMETRICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WETMETRICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Vana

JAMES L VANA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to authenticate and verify an individual based on recorded and unrecorded life experience and preference information stored in the individual brain; Computer software designed to authenticate and verify an individual based on recorded and unrecorded life experience and preference information stored in the individual brainACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance