USPTO serial 78342103
CHATEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHATEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Other trademarks owned by CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Other trademarks owned by CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan P. Willson
SUSAN P WILLSON SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | commercial management assistance; business management and organization consultation; market analysis; business management consultation; retail store services featuring dairy products, fresh meats, frozen foods, fresh produce, beer and wine and non-alcoholic beverages; organizing, conducting and promoting trade fairs relating to food, food ingredients, food additives, the food industry or to health, all for commercial and advertising purposes; business consulting services relating to product distribution, operations management services, supply chain, and production systems and distribution solutions; business development services, namely, providing start-up support for business of others; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants, providing goods or services price quotations, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurants; products merchandising; providing consumer information in the field of restaurants | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | organizing and conducting seminars, conferences and congresses, all relating to food, food ingredients, food additives, the food industry or to health; educational services, namely, providing educational testing and training services and distributing course material in connection therewith in the fields of food and cooking; arranging and conducting educational conferences; conducting workshops and seminars in personal awareness; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of food | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | bar services, cafes, restaurants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CHAINTEA (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HOLDING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Chatea (Cayman) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHATEA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |