Drawing for THE ELECTRONIC COURTHOUSE

USPTO serial 78342273

THE ELECTRONIC COURTHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2974860Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
DEJESUS, YSA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE ELECTRONIC COURTHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret A. Boulware

MARGARET A BOULWARE BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP711 LOUISIANA STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a directory of companies and websites of alternative dispute resolution participants; alternative dispute resolution adjudicator referral servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042Alternative dispute resolution services and consulting services in the field of alternative dispute resolutionSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 19, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance