USPTO serial 78342290
ARROGANT COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARROGANT COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dennard, Douglas, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
Jersey City, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Dennard, Douglas, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
de la Fortune, Pierre, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Other trademarks owned by de la Fortune, Pierre, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | G and S-- Men's, women's, teenagers, children's and infants' clothing, namely, dresses, gloves, skirts, shorts, jackets, dress shirts, sport shirts, knit shirts, trousers, pants, jeans, blouses, vests, blazers, overalls, watches, crew and v-neck shirts, head and wrist bands, bras, sweatshirts, sweatpants, tank tops, T-shirts, sweaters, swimwear, gloves, mittens, scarves, belts, socks, hosiery, bodysuits, tights, ties, suits, coats, robes, loungewear, cover-ups, bed jackets, sleepwear separates, pajamas, night shirts, rainwear, tennis wear, namely, knitted vests, sweaters, shorts, knit shirts, knitted fleece and woven coordinated jackets and tops, knitted fleece warm-up suits, sports jackets, parkas, overcoats, topcoats, jogging suits, underwear, wrist bands, aprons, pullovers, hooded tops, headbands, baby bunting, bathing suits, cloth baby bibs, bonnets, coveralls, creepers, dressing gowns, jumpers, nightgowns, rompers, snow suits, sun suits, kimonos, halters, hats and footwear | ACTIVE | Sep 23, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dennard, Douglas, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by de la Fortune, Pierre, DBA, DE LA FORTUNE ENTERPRISE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ARROGANT COLLECTION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |