Drawing for Serial No. 78342352

USPTO serial 78342352

Serial No. 78342352

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78342352?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL J. JACOBSON

DANIEL J JACOBSON AKERMAN SENTERFITT1 SE 3RD AVE FL 28MIAMI, FL 33131-1715UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric scissorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2005ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jul 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 19, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance