USPTO serial 78342485
THUG A BOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THUG A BOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Pollack
Jonathan Pollack Barnes Morris Klein Mark Yorn Barnes & L3rd Floor, North Tower2000 Avenue of the StarsLos Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls, doll clothing and doll accessories; doll houses, doll furniture and doll furniture accessories; doll cases; stuffed toys; toy airplanes; balloons; Halloween masks; toy bakeware and cookware; sport balls; toy banks; bath toys; bean bags; toy building blocks; play wands; music box toys; bubble-making wands and solution sets; card games; Christmas tree ornaments; children's play cosmetics; flying discs; roller skates; ice skates; in-line skates; jigsaw puzzles; jump ropes; kites; play swimming pools; puppets; ride-on toys; water-squirting toys; Christmas stockings; collectible toy figures; drawing toys; play tents; play houses; radio-controlled toy vehicles; talking toys; slide puzzles; board games; parlor games; role-playing games; toy vehicles and accessories therefor; coin-operated arcade games, hand-held units for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |