USPTO serial 78342862
OERLIKON-CONTRAVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3415518Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 2008
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OERLIKON-CONTRAVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zurich, CH
Zurich, CH
Zurich, CH
ZURICH, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Linderman
John C. Linderman McCormick, Paulding & Huber LLP185 Asylum Street, CityPlace IIMcCormick, Paulding & Huber LLPHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Weapon control systems namely, electric and electronic apparatus for the control of anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons; electronic controlled and electronic assisted apparatus for aiming weapons, for computing ranges of targets and for measuring the trajectories of projectiles and flying targets, namely, fire control units controlled by radar, electro-optical, and laser sensors; radar assisted and radar controlled equipment for use in weaponry, namely, fire control units; electronic apparatus for guided missile systems, namely, electro-optical units, laser units and radar units, search and tracking apparatus for firing guided missiles, controlling guided missile systems, and defending against guided missile attacks; electronic fire control systems for ground-to-ground and ground-to-air shells, electronic fire control and detection equipment, namely, electronic fire control units, target detection and tracking equipment, namely, radar scanners for sky surveillance and target tracking, electro-optical target tracking and sighting equipment, namely, TV or Infrared cameras for military purposes; anti-aircraft fire control and detection equipment for anti-aircraft tanks, namely, fire control units, electronic fire control systems for gun and rocket artillery, target detection and tracking equipment, namely, radar scanners for sky surveillance and target tracking, optical-electronic target tracking and sighting equipment, namely, TV cameras for military purposes; target tracking and sighting equipment operating with infra-red and laser radiation, namely, Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) cameras and lasers for military purposes; electronic gun and rocket-launcher trackers using fire-control apparatus; photo theodolites; geodetic and telemetry systems comprised of hardware and software for measuring data transmission and evaluation; computer-controlled coordinatographs for plotting graphs, construction plans, maps, electrical hardware and indicators; electrical multi-position selector switches; television cameras and militarized electro-optic cameras and militarized TV-cameras; range and angular measuring equipment and leveling instruments, namely, gyros, mechanical and electronic levels; optical-electrical data acquisition equipment, namely, Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) TV target control units, amplifiers, transducers, filters, logic circuits and hardware for processing of electronic signals, namely, militarized computers and servos; electric and electronic apparatus and devices, instruments, namely, computers, servos, leveling instruments, power supplies, printed circuits, hybrid circuits, printed circuits with or without components; tracking mounts and parts thereof; stabilizing systems, namely, mechanical and laser gyros; sights, namely, sighting control equipment for weapon systems, radar, laser and/or electro-optical systems, optical systems, telemetry systems for measuring data transmission and evaluation; computers; microprocessors; electronic data-processors, display-screens and printers; communication units and systems assembled from such units, namely computers, microcomputers, electronic data processors, display screens, plan position indicators and printers and video screens, communications buses, connection boxes, and UHF and VHF radio communication systems; registration and recording system, apparatus and devices for training of operators of fire control systems and weapon systems, namely, registration and recording systems, namely, data and image recorders connectable to militarized television cameras and militarized electro-optic cameras; apparatus and devices for training of operators of fire control systems and weapon systems, namely, computers, simulation hardware; training equipment for trackers, namely, computers, software and simulation hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2005 |
| 013 | Firearms, namely, guns and guided weapons; weapon systems, namely, anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons; ground-to-ground and ground-to-air shells; metal launching platforms and devices for guided missiles and rockets and their parts, components and accessories, namely, vehicles, rotable turrets, computers; ammunition and projectiles all sold as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Contraves AG
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Contraves AG
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Contraves AG
- Other trademarks owned by RHEINMETALL AIR DEFENCE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named OERLIKON-CONTRAVES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |