USPTO serial 78343379
DYNAMIC PROTECTED AMERICAN VALUE FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC PROTECTED AMERICAN VALUE FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontrario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
Midge M. Hyman Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MUTUAL FUND SERVICES, NAMELY, FUND BROKERAGE, MUTUAL FUND DISTRIBUTION AND THE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF MUTUAL FUNDS; MUTUAL FUND SERVICES, NAMELY, FUND BROKERAGE, MUTUAL FUND DISTRIBUTION AND THE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |