USPTO serial 78343762
TASTE THE MADNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199346Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TASTE THE MADNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Other trademarks owned by THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
March Madness Athletic Association LLC
Bloomington, IL
Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
March Madness Athletic Association LLC
Bloomington, IL
Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
March Madness Athletic Association LLC
Bloomington, IL
Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas N. Masters
DOUGLAS N MASTERS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK ST STE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese, sour cream, lunch meats and hot dogs; salty snacks, namely, processed nuts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Cookies; crackers; pretzels; wafers; salad dressings; mayonnaise-based sandwich spreads; coffee; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta and cheese sauce; pizza; breakfast cereals; and prepared and packaged cereal-based, rice-based, or granola-based snack foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
- Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
- Other trademarks owned by March Madness Athletic Association LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TASTE THE MADNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |