USPTO serial 78344493
ONCOINSIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONCOINSIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K Ebling
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44) Computer software for use in information management, market analysis, forecasting and business planning in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; communications computer software linking users to remote databases; (Based on Sections 1(b) and 44) Computer software for use in customer planning and customer relations management. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 041 | (Based on Sections 1(a) and 44) Training via telephone in the use of computer software for information management, communications computer software linking data bases and services in remote computer information management, market analysis, forecasting and business planning in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; (Based on Sections 1(b) and 44) Training via telephone in the use of computer software for use in customer planning and customer relations management. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
| 042 | Providing the use of databases, bulletin boards and related information services in the field of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology; consulting services, namely, business planning consultation in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries; providing report and other information through a password-protected website in the fields of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Strategic Answers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONCOINSIGHTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |