Drawing for CONCEPTION TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78344507

CONCEPTION TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCEPTION TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad Bohrer

BRAD BOHRER BLANCHARD, KRASNER & FRENCH APC800 SILVERADO ST 2ND FLLA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Custom Manufacturing of Infertility and Fertility DevicesACTIVEAug 31, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 20, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 19, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance