USPTO serial 78344585
SEGAL'S ORIGINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEGAL'S ORIGINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorie Choderker
DORIE CHODERKER LAW OFFICES OF DORIE CHODERKER2ND FL 1901 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | natural sweeteners; sugar; sugar substitutes; coffee; tea; cocoa; artificial coffee; beverages, namely, beverages made of coffee, beverages made of tea, cappuccino, coffee-based beverages containing milk, espresso, iced tea, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages, prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages, shakes, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; flavoring syrups; coffee flavored syrups used in making food beverages; flour and preparations made from cereal, namely, cereal based snack foods; bread; pastry and confectionery, namely, bakery desserts, bakery goods, bakery products, candy, candy bars, candy mints, chocolate, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate truffles, cookies, gum sweets, sugar free sweets, sugarless candies, sugarless sweets; flavored ices; honey; treacle; salt, mustards; vinegars; sauces; condiments, namely, barbeque sauces, ketchup, mayonnaise, hot sauces; spices; and salad dressings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |