Drawing for RED

USPTO serial 78345031

RED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Bush

DOUGLAS R. BUSH ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, documents, and sound via computer networks; providing online electronic bulletin boards and chat rooms for transmission of messages, photos, and notes among a group of computer users concerning music, movies, sports, education, comics, computer games, news, and user-defined topics of general interest; providing online computer network facilities for real time interaction and communication with other computer users concerning topics of general interest; electronic mail servicesABANDONEDDec 18, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 4, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 4, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 4, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 4, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 23, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 28, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 17, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance