Drawing for PAOLA BELLE

USPTO serial 78345157

PAOLA BELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAOLA BELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025shoes and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance