Drawing for BELLA DONNA D'ITALIA

USPTO serial 78345560

BELLA DONNA D'ITALIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BELLA DONNA D'ITALIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond A. Kurz

RAYMOND A KURZ HOGAN & HARTSON LLP555 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, ladies' and children's clothing, namely, jeans, t-shirts, shorts, pants, skirts, sweatpants, sweatshirts, jackets, coats, shortpants, bermudas, blouses, belts, hats, gloves, ties and scarvesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 17, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 17, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 17, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 4, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 3, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance