USPTO serial 78345715
BEAR RING 'N MIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAR RING 'N MIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia V9J 1T1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Voelzke
STEPHEN J STRAUSS ESQ FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPTENTH FL6060 CTR DRLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC SLEEVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO GENERATE CARDS FOR PLACEMENT IN PLASTIC SLEEVES, BLANK CARDS, SAMPLE CARDS, PLASTIC TEMPLATES FOR CREATING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS ALL FOR USE IN MAKING PLAYING CARDS; KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC SLEEVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO GENERATE CARDS FOR PLACEMENT IN PLASTIC SLEEVES, BLANK CARDS, SAMPLE CARDS, PLASTIC TEMPLATES FOR CREATING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS ALL FOR USE IN MAKING GAME CARDS; KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC SLEEVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO GENERATE CARDS FOR PLACEMENT IN PLASTIC SLEEVES, BLANK CARDS, SAMPLE CARDS, PLASTIC TEMPLATES FOR CREATING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS ALL FOR USE IN MAKING FLASH CARDS; KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC SLEEVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO GENERATE CARDS FOR PLACEMENT IN PLASTIC SLEEVES, BLANK CARDS, SAMPLE CARDS, PLASTIC TEMPLATES FOR CREATING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS ALL FOR USE IN MAKING STORY-TELLING PROMPTS; KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC SLEEVES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO GENERATE CARDS FOR PLACEMENT IN PLASTIC SLEEVES, BLANK CARDS, SAMPLE CARDS, PLASTIC TEMPLATES FOR CREATING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS ALL FOR USE IN MAKING CUE CARDS; AND CHILDREN BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | pictures frames; pictures frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | stuffed animals; stuffed animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF CHILDREN'S ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maddocks, Patricia
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEAR RING 'N MIND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |