USPTO serial 78345878
HIP HOP KIDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIP HOP KIDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Kurshner
Richard A. Kurshner Richard A. Kurshner, P.C.10950 WASHINGTON BLVD.SUITE 240CULVER CITY, CA 90232Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Compact disks featuring a dramatic story, dance and musical performances and musical sound recordings; prerecorded video discs featuring musical performances and dramatic performances and prerecorded audio discs featuring musical performances; (Based on Intent to Use) Children's game software, children's educational software; interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; computer game equipment containing memory devices namely, discs; video game machines for use with televisions, electronic game programs | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) T-shirts, shorts, sweat pants, visors, jackets, blue jeans and overalls; boy and girls sports wear, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, hats, wrists bands, shoes, shirts, underwear, socks, head bands and skirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HHK ENTERTAINMENT, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by HHK ENTERTAINMENT, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hip Hop Kidz Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HIP HOP KIDZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |