USPTO serial 78346216
BIOVAXID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3112639Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOVAXID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longboat Key, FL
Longboat Key, FL
Longboat Key, FL
WORCESTER, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COREY K. CHO
COREY K. CHO SALIWANCHIK LLOYD & EISENSCHENKP.O. Box 142950GAINESVILLE, FL 32614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Biologic product compositions for human use, namely, vaccines and antibody compositions, for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment and prevention of diseases | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hopkins Capital Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hopkins Capital Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hopkins Capital Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL,INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BIOVAXID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |