Drawing for MCALAN

USPTO serial 78346254

MCALAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCALAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terese R. Cohen

Terese R. Cohen Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LL399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, shirts, sweaters, skirts, dresses, trousers, shorts, jackets, stockings, socks, undergarments, scarves, ties and gloves; footwear; headwearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance